What the hell are we thinking?
Less blah-blah. More ah-ha.
“If I had more time, I would have written you a shorter letter.” With such smart insight, Goethe would probably be one of the best copywriters and conceptors today.
After all, the strength of a message is based on the core of an idea. In short: the short version.
The misconception: If you don’t have much time, you can make it shorter.
In fact, the opposite is true: When we lack time, we pack as much available information as possible into one text. An email. A message.
A briefing. A strategy. A presentation. A Facebook comment.
By 2017, Twitter had already increased its number of characters from 140 to 280.
Because we don’t always have time to focus on the essence of a thought.
Now time is the new currency. And it’s worth our investment. To shorten a text, no matter what, no matter who it’s for, bit by bit. No unnecessary repetitions. No fluffy filler words. Nothing between the lines. Fewer ifs and buts. More what do I actually want to say, and, how much do I want to say.
The clarity lies in the brevity.
Anyone who manages to keep it short is often one step ahead of others. Crisp messages surprise – and are surprisingly well-received. Best case scenario: They are memorable.
Of course, it’s not everything. You need a good idea. And that needs, you guessed it, time.
I’ll end with a very brief book recommendation:
Max, Mischa & the Tet Offensive by Johan Harstad.
A moving 1248-page story. There’s a lot to enjoy! But who knows, maybe 1248 pages is how the author keeps things short.
Thnks fr yr attntn.
People make the brands
Why is the brand “Germany” under Angela Merkel so badly received internationally? Why is the USA under Donald Trump currently doing so much better?
Why are Die Grünen with Team Habeck & Baerbock or AfD with the Weidel & Gauland duo currently so successful? After Schröder, Gabriel, Schulz and Nahles, why is the SPD so far removed from its status as ‘the people’s party’?
Why did Bayern Munich hardly win under coach van Gaal? Yet coach Heynckes helps them win the triple?
Why does a brand like Deutsche Bank struggle today and why is a brand like Adidas so successful?
It’s the people, stupid.
“Brands make people” – this is the marketing point of view of everyone who works in marketing.
“People make brands” – is a perspective that we tend to ignore.
But behind brands like Deutsche Bank, SPD, Bayern Munich or Adidas are people. People with their very own qualities, characteristics, visions, knowledge, experience, attitudes and values.
It is these people with their very own individual backgrounds who make the brands.
They put their goals on banners (or get them written into their contracts), they are constantly rearranging their teams and also getting new teams through agencies.
All these minds shape the life cycle of brands with their energy, their thinking and their expertise. They can increase, extend or even shorten that life cycle. Often significantly.
Which of you marketeers out there prioritizes the love of the brand in their career choice? Let’s be honest. Hand on your heart. Isn’t the salary or the company and one’s own career most important? At the top management level, profilers are used to screen prospective CEOs. Meanwhile, pitching is still being used to select agencies, a process with a sell-by date that expired long ago.
But, honestly, who is examining the people who will work for the brands? Who looks at whether the values the brand stands for can also be credibly and sustainably represented by its leaders?
To do this, you can establish processes that determine whether there is a “brand fit” – between people and brands.
Exactly what happens routinely for a potential customer base (a.k.a., the target group, as it’s known in the depths of the market research jungle) should also be implemented for the people who are supposed to work for the brand.
A process to gauge whether there is a shared mindset between person and brand.
For this, there are profiling tools or initial chemistry meetings which can at the very least reveal whether you can work together.
However, the recruiting process requires more systematic methods that can be flexibly applied to every company, every hierarchy and every brand.
So go on, work with your headhunter and HR to let the right people work with the right brands.
#brandship #brandfit #peoplebusiness
It's the purpose folks.
“To create a better everyday life for the many people.”
What Ikea so simply expresses in its vision can safely be regarded as the essential recipe for success for any company.
The purpose, or whatever we like to call it:
The determination, the goal, the overriding vision of a company is rapidly gaining importance outside of innovation panels, trend lectures and specialist literature.
In fact, we’ve found ourselves talking more often with customers, teams and partners about a “purpose-founded revolution”.
This fits into our time, in which sustainability, transparency and authenticity are rapidly gaining importance for brands. Meanwhile classic marketing is undergoing a dynamic change.
In the future, more and more successful brands will be those that manage to place meaningful added value at the center of their actions – while clearly communicating it. Regardless of whether the purpose is about improving individual living conditions, saving time, customization, self-realization or sustainable enjoyment, the business models of the future need to be rethought.
It is also important that we stop defining success only in the classical sense of shareholder value through growth and profit, but also in completely new categories.
At the same time, companies must improve their soft skills and use innovative technologies to measurably strengthen their empathy both internally and externally, to develop more understanding and to gain a deeper know-how for teams, partners, customers and users alike.
Brands and companies that can stand for a convincing purpose won’t just live it themselves, but will be amongst the most successful brands of the future.
You need to understand that life isn’t what you’re given, it’s what you create, what you conquer and what you aim to achieve.
No touchpoint resonates like music.
For us record collectors, brands go by a different name: labels. These brands are much more than just generic music publishers. Labels have their own kind of magic, encouraging DJs to create signature styles and interpret the spirit of their fans via a 12-inch disc.
Labels are brands that vinyl lovers willingly lose their hearts to. They succeed thanks to their unbeatable touchpoints: songs.
The products that record labels create naturally deliver a unique user experience. Collectors use the songs to celebrate the parties of their youth and survive the crises of growing up. Hardly any other product can resonate with, and unite, its customers like music can.
As a lyricist and record collector, I believe that brands can learn a lot from record labels. Labels live Brandship in its purest form. They offer people unique horizons of experience, charge their logos with irresistible appeal and have the kind of fanbases other industries only dream of. Any brand that can touch people emotionally in the same way as a record label does, won’t just have customers, but friends for life.